Core i3-2100 vs i3-7100U
Description
The i3-2100 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2100 gets a score of 40.1 k points while the i3-7100U gets 60.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 1.5 times faster than the i3-2100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2100 gets a score of 40.1 k points while the i3-7100U gets 60.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 1.5 times faster than the i3-2100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
806e9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
February 2011
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
19.52k points
33.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.1k points
79.6k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-2100
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
8.76k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
7.16k
13.49k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.62k
3.21k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
3.9k (x1.46)
TOTAL
19.52k
29.36k (x1.5)
Multithread
i3-2100
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.19k
18.33k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
15.19k
31.08k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.26k
7.5k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
3.61k (x1.04)
TOTAL
40.1k
60.52k (x1.51)
Performance/W
i3-2100
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
218 points/W
1222 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
234 points/W
2072 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112 points/W
500 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
240 points/W
TOTAL
617 points/W
4035 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-2100
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
2279 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2311 points/GHz
5622 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
845 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
862 points/GHz
1624 points/GHz
TOTAL
6297 points/GHz
12235 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4