Core i3-2100 vs Ryzen 5 3500U
Description
The i3-2100 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2100 gets a score of 40.1 k points while the 3500U gets 146.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 3.7 times faster than the i3-2100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2100 gets a score of 40.1 k points while the 3500U gets 146.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 3.7 times faster than the i3-2100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
810f81
Core
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2011
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
19.52k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.1k points
140.97k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-2100
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
11.1k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
7.16k
18.97k (x2.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.62k
3.9k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
3.39k (x1.27)
TOTAL
19.52k
37.37k (x1.91)
Multithread
i3-2100
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.19k
45.74k (x3.22)
Test#2 (FP)
15.19k
75.47k (x4.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.26k
21.89k (x3.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
3.49k (x1.01)
TOTAL
40.1k
146.6k (x3.66)
Performance/W
i3-2100
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
218 points/W
3049 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
234 points/W
5032 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112 points/W
1459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
233 points/W
TOTAL
617 points/W
9773 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-2100
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2279 points/GHz
3001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2311 points/GHz
5128 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
845 points/GHz
1053 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
862 points/GHz
916 points/GHz
TOTAL
6297 points/GHz
10099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4