Core i3-2100 vs A6 7310
Description
The i3-2100 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 7310 is based on Puma.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2100 gets a score of 40.1 k points while the 7310 gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-2100 is 1.1 times faster than the 7310. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2100 gets a score of 40.1 k points while the 7310 gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-2100 is 1.1 times faster than the 7310. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
730f01
Core
Carrizo-L
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
FP4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
65 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
February 2011
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
19.52k points
11.17k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.1k points
35.87k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-2100
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
4.08k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
7.16k
3.76k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.62k
2.21k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
1.12k (x0.42)
TOTAL
19.52k
11.17k (x0.57)
Multithread
i3-2100
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
14.19k
13.38k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
15.19k
13.51k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.26k
7.39k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
1.59k (x0.46)
TOTAL
40.1k
35.87k (x0.89)
Performance/W
i3-2100
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
218 points/W
535 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
234 points/W
540 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112 points/W
296 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
617 points/W
1435 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-2100
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
2279 points/GHz
1700 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2311 points/GHz
1566 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
845 points/GHz
921 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
862 points/GHz
467 points/GHz
TOTAL
6297 points/GHz
4654 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4