| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs Xeon W-2223


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 2.3 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
50657
Core
Comet Lake-U
Glacier Falls
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8448 kB
Date
January 2019
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
243.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.97k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
14.5k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
4.78k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
8.19k (x1.9)
TOTAL
28.98k
31.45k (x1.09)

Multithread

i3-10110U

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
15.56k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
59.23k (x2.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
22.87k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
6.85k (x2.09)
TOTAL
50.13k
104.51k (x2.08)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
25.09k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
20.76k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.07k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
8.76k (x1.87)
TOTAL
56.64k
59.68k (x1.05)

Multithread

i3-10110U

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
111.43k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
100.2k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
24.67k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
6.89k (x1.73)
TOTAL
106.58k
243.18k (x2.28)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
2027 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4