| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs Xeon E5506


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 80.9 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5506 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
106a5
Core
Comet Lake-U
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /4
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
90.45k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
1.21k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
2.75k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
1.94k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
0.78k (x0.18)
TOTAL
28.98k
6.68k (x0.23)

Multithread

i3-10110U

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
12.25k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
25.55k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
17.1k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
5.01k (x1.53)
TOTAL
50.13k
59.9k (x1.19)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
4.48k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
2.99k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
1.81k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
0.69k (x0.16)
TOTAL
43.87k
9.97k (x0.23)

Multithread

i3-10110U

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
41k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
28.17k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
17.4k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
3.88k (x1.21)
TOTAL
80.85k
90.45k (x1.12)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1700 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2755 points/W
352 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
5390 points/W
1131 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
3487 points/GHz
2099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4901 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
10699 points/GHz
4675 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4