| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs Xeon E5-2680 v2


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 84.2 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 6.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
306e4
Core
Comet Lake-U
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
10 /20
TDP
15 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
25600 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
551.1k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
11.96k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
10.73k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
4.59k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
4.31k (x1.01)
TOTAL
43.87k
31.6k (x0.72)

Multithread

i3-10110U

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
218.24k (x8.56)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
206.92k (x5.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
100.37k (x9.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
11.45k (x3.56)
TOTAL
80.85k
536.99k (x6.64)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
10.55k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
10.02k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
3.99k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
3.66k (x0.86)
TOTAL
45.22k
28.23k (x0.62)

Multithread

i3-10110U

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
215.04k (x8.22)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
230.43k (x5.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
96.87k (x9.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
8.76k (x2.67)
TOTAL
84.17k
551.1k (x6.55)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1743 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2935 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
218 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
5611 points/W
4792 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3476 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5256 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1258 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1039 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
11029 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4