Core i3-10110U vs Core 2 Duo E8500
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E8500 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 80.9 k points while the E8500 gets 31.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 2.6 times faster than the E8500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 80.9 k points while the E8500 gets 31.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 2.6 times faster than the E8500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
1067a
Core
Comet Lake-U
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.167 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
January 2019
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
19.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
31.21k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
3.65k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
8.07k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
3.15k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
4.59k (x1.08)
TOTAL
43.87k
19.46k (x0.44)
Multithread
i3-10110U
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
7.11k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
15.79k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
6.2k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
2.13k (x0.66)
TOTAL
80.85k
31.21k (x0.39)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
1700 points/W
109 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2755 points/W
243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
95 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
5390 points/W
480 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
3487 points/GHz
1151 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4901 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
1450 points/GHz
TOTAL
10699 points/GHz
6144 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4