Core i3-10110U vs i7-7660U
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-7660U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i7-7660U gets 132.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7660U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i7-7660U gets 132.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7660U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
806e9
Core
Comet Lake-U
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
57.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
132.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
22.46k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
19.29k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
4.77k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
10.94k (x2.33)
TOTAL
56.64k
57.46k (x1.01)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
56.67k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
46.95k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
12.36k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
16.84k (x4.23)
TOTAL
106.58k
132.81k (x1.25)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
3778 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
3130 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
824 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
1122 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
8854 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
5614 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
4823 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
2735 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
14365 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4