| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs i7-5820K


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-5820K is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 84.2 k points while the i7-5820K gets 129.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-U
Haswell-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
15360 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
31.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
129.06k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.82k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
9.64k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
4.29k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
3.78k (x0.88)
TOTAL
28.98k
21.53k (x0.74)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
18.07k (x2.44)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
64.25k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
27.03k (x2.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
8.03k (x2.45)
TOTAL
50.13k
117.38k (x2.34)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
12.03k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
11.23k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
4.55k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
3.72k (x0.87)
TOTAL
45.22k
31.53k (x0.7)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
49.48k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
52.21k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
19.7k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
7.67k (x2.34)
TOTAL
84.17k
129.06k (x1.53)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
1743 points/W
353 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2935 points/W
373 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/W
141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
218 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
5611 points/W
922 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3476 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5256 points/GHz
3119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1258 points/GHz
1264 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1039 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
TOTAL
11029 points/GHz
8759 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4