Core i3-10110U vs i5-8350U
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-8350U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i5-8350U gets 112.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8350U is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i5-8350U gets 112.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8350U is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
806ea
Core
Comet Lake-U
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
38.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
112.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
16.74k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
14.66k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
2.79k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
4.12k (x0.88)
TOTAL
56.64k
38.31k (x0.68)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
51.05k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
45.59k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
10.69k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
4.78k (x1.2)
TOTAL
106.58k
112.12k (x1.05)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
3403 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
3039 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
7475 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
4650 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
4071 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
776 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
10642 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4