Core i3-10110U vs Celeron J3455
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the J3455 is based on Goldmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 80.9 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.7 times faster than the J3455. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 80.9 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.7 times faster than the J3455. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
506c9
Core
Comet Lake-U
Apollo Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
12.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
47.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
6.02k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
3.49k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
2.01k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
1.47k (x0.35)
TOTAL
43.87k
12.98k (x0.3)
Multithread
i3-10110U
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
23.7k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
13.75k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
7.8k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
2.09k (x0.65)
TOTAL
80.85k
47.34k (x0.59)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
1700 points/W
2370 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2755 points/W
1375 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
780 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
5390 points/W
4734 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
3487 points/GHz
2619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4901 points/GHz
1517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
872 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
637 points/GHz
TOTAL
10699 points/GHz
5645 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4