| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 6.7 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
806d0
Core
Comet Lake-U
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2019
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
709.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.4k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
20.25k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
11.69k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
11.66k (x2.71)
TOTAL
28.98k
48.01k (x1.66)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
38.93k (x5.25)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
191.89k (x6.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
108.8k (x10.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
14.95k (x4.57)
TOTAL
50.13k
354.57k (x7.07)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
15.22k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
25.2k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
12.66k (x2.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
11.66k (x2.75)
TOTAL
43.87k
64.74k (x1.48)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
155.37k (x6.09)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
260.27k (x6.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
115.37k (x10.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
20.04k (x6.24)
TOTAL
80.85k
551.04k (x6.82)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
17.25k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
25.53k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
12.56k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
11.4k (x2.68)
TOTAL
45.22k
66.74k (x1.48)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
144.5k (x5.53)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
243.41k (x5.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
109.02k (x10.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
16k (x4.89)
TOTAL
84.17k
512.94k (x6.09)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
30.84k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
26.38k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
12.66k (x2.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
11.74k (x2.5)
TOTAL
56.64k
81.62k (x1.44)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
294.86k (x6.14)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
280.92k (x6.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
113.9k (x11.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
20.16k (x5.07)
TOTAL
106.58k
709.85k (x6.66)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4