Core i3-10110U vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 7.9 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 7.9 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
a20f10
Core
Comet Lake-U
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/24
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
January 2019
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
89.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
840.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
24.34k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
26.8k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
12.12k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
26.55k (x5.65)
TOTAL
56.64k
89.82k (x1.59)
Multithread
i3-10110U
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
263.12k (x5.48)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
353.9k (x7.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
159.07k (x15.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
64.01k (x16.1)
TOTAL
106.58k
840.11k (x7.88)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
2506 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
3371 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1515 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
610 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
8001 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
5071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
18712 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4