Core i3-10110U vs Ryzen 7 6800H
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 4.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 4.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
a40f41
Core
Comet Lake-U
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
478.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
21.04k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
22.41k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
10.21k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
24.27k (x5.17)
TOTAL
56.64k
77.93k (x1.38)
Multithread
i3-10110U
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
158.65k (x3.31)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
215.86k (x4.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
89.45k (x8.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
14.77k (x3.71)
TOTAL
106.58k
478.73k (x4.49)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
10638 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4