Core i3-10110U vs FX 8350
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 8350 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 84.2 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 84.2 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
600f20
Core
Comet Lake-U
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
28.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
118.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
9.85k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
8.41k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
3.58k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
6.32k (x1.48)
TOTAL
45.22k
28.16k (x0.62)
Multithread
i3-10110U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
44.93k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
45.21k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
22.81k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
5.19k (x1.58)
TOTAL
84.17k
118.14k (x1.4)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
1743 points/W
359 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2935 points/W
362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
218 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
5611 points/W
945 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3476 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5256 points/GHz
2050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1258 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1039 points/GHz
1541 points/GHz
TOTAL
11029 points/GHz
6867 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4