| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs A10 7700K


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 7700K is based on Steamroller.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 84.2 k points while the 7700K gets 57.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.5 times faster than the 7700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
630f01
Core
Comet Lake-U
Kaveri
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
Socket FM2+
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2014
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
21.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
57.89k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
7.33k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
7.99k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
2.91k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
3.15k (x0.74)
TOTAL
45.22k
21.38k (x0.47)

Multithread

i3-10110U

7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
23.06k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
20.11k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
10.44k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
4.28k (x1.31)
TOTAL
84.17k
57.89k (x0.69)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
1743 points/W
243 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2935 points/W
212 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/W
110 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
218 points/W
45 points/W
TOTAL
5611 points/W
609 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3476 points/GHz
1929 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5256 points/GHz
2101 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1258 points/GHz
765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1039 points/GHz
830 points/GHz
TOTAL
11029 points/GHz
5625 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4