| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-U
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.75k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
17.22k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
9.79k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
8.21k (x1.91)
TOTAL
28.98k
38.97k (x1.34)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
9.19k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
35.47k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
19.14k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
5.82k (x1.78)
TOTAL
50.13k
69.62k (x1.39)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
12.9k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
21.4k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
10.73k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
8.16k (x1.92)
TOTAL
43.87k
53.19k (x1.21)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
30.31k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
45.13k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
20.17k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
5.77k (x1.8)
TOTAL
80.85k
101.38k (x1.25)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
14.65k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
21.57k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
9.93k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
8.02k (x1.88)
TOTAL
45.22k
54.18k (x1.2)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
32.14k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
43.54k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
19.58k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
5.61k (x1.71)
TOTAL
84.17k
100.87k (x1.2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
24.25k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
21.63k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
9.09k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
7.23k (x1.54)
TOTAL
56.64k
62.19k (x1.1)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
56.9k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
55.68k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
19.29k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
6.09k (x1.53)
TOTAL
106.58k
137.96k (x1.29)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4