| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs Xeon W-2223


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
50657
Core
Comet Lake-S
Glacier Falls
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8448 kB
Date
March 2021
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
243.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
3.97k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
14.5k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
4.78k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
8.19k (x0.99)
TOTAL
36.97k
31.45k (x0.85)

Multithread

i3-10105

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
15.56k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
59.23k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
22.87k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
6.85k (x1.92)
TOTAL
123.2k
104.51k (x0.85)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
25.09k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
20.76k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
5.07k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
8.76k (x1.06)
TOTAL
68.92k
59.68k (x0.87)

Multithread

i3-10105

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
111.43k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
100.2k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
24.67k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
6.89k (x1.94)
TOTAL
253.93k
243.18k (x0.96)

Performance/W
i3-10105
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
2027 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4