| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10105
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.11k
13.1k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
11.91k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.71k
4.83k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
3.83k (x0.49)
TOTAL
53.83k
33.68k (x0.63)

Multithread

i3-10105

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
58.25k
105.42k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
105.73k
109.99k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.8k
44.56k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
17.7k (x5.05)
TOTAL
195.29k
277.66k (x1.42)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
20.99k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
11.9k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
4.72k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
3.75k (x0.45)
TOTAL
68.92k
41.36k (x0.6)

Multithread

i3-10105

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
172.62k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
110.03k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
44.06k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
16.93k (x4.76)
TOTAL
253.93k
343.64k (x1.35)

Performance/W
i3-10105
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4