Core i3-10105 vs Xeon E5-1660 v3
Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-1660 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the E5-1660 v3 gets 353 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the E5-1660 v3 gets 353 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
41.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
352.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
20.92k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
11.87k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
4.67k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
3.85k (x0.47)
TOTAL
68.92k
41.31k (x0.6)
Multithread
i3-10105
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
174.59k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
116.47k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
44.79k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
17.1k (x4.81)
TOTAL
253.93k
352.96k (x1.39)
Performance/W
i3-10105
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
832 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
320 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
122 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
2521 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10105
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
5977 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
3391 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1333 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
1101 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
11802 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4