Core i3-10105 vs i9-10980XE
Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.9 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.9 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
50657
Core
Comet Lake-S
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
18/36
TDP
65 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
25344 kB
Date
March 2021
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
1241.12k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
4.52k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
17.94k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
5.5k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
9.64k (x1.16)
TOTAL
36.97k
37.6k (x1.02)
Multithread
i3-10105
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
84.93k (x5.27)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
409.55k (x5.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
122.88k (x4.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
22.12k (x6.19)
TOTAL
123.2k
639.48k (x5.19)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10105
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
16.19k
16.03k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
23.95k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
6.03k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
9.37k (x1.11)
TOTAL
53.77k
55.38k (x1.03)
Multithread
i3-10105
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
57.59k
316.11k (x5.49)
Test#2 (FP)
100.63k
503.75k (x5.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.59k
131.82k (x4.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
22.24k (x6.25)
TOTAL
190.38k
973.92k (x5.12)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10105
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
16.11k
16.4k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
20.97k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.71k
5.82k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
8.86k (x1.12)
TOTAL
53.83k
52.05k (x0.97)
Multithread
i3-10105
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
58.25k
316.84k (x5.44)
Test#2 (FP)
105.73k
461.09k (x4.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.8k
129.82k (x4.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
22.09k (x6.3)
TOTAL
195.29k
929.85k (x4.76)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
29.53k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
22.59k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
5.99k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
10.22k (x1.23)
TOTAL
68.92k
68.33k (x0.99)
Multithread
i3-10105
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
587.06k (x5.26)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
496.41k (x4.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
134.66k (x4.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
22.99k (x6.46)
TOTAL
253.93k
1241.12k (x4.89)
Performance/W
i3-10105
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
7522 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10105
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4