Core i3-10105 vs A6 3600
Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 190.4 k points while the 3600 gets 44.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 4.3 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 190.4 k points while the 3600 gets 44.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 4.3 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
300f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Llano
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
Socket FM1
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x64 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2021
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
12.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
44.12k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10105
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.19k
4.03k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
4.25k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
2.19k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
1.54k (x0.18)
TOTAL
53.77k
12.01k (x0.22)
Multithread
i3-10105
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
57.59k
15.66k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
100.63k
16.66k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.59k
8.33k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
3.48k (x0.98)
TOTAL
190.38k
44.12k (x0.23)
Performance/W
i3-10105
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
886 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1548 points/W
256 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
440 points/W
128 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
2929 points/W
679 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10105
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3679 points/GHz
1680 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5244 points/GHz
1770 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1923 points/GHz
642 points/GHz
TOTAL
12219 points/GHz
5006 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4