| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs i7-12800H


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-12800H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i7-12800H gets 467.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12800H is 1.8 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906a3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
14/20
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
24576 kB
Date
March 2021
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
67.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
467.41k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
i7-12800H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
28.42k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
18.93k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
9.92k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
9.86k (x1.19)
TOTAL
68.92k
67.13k (x0.97)

Multithread

i3-10105

i7-12800H
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
205.57k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
159.7k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
82.78k (x2.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
19.36k (x5.44)
TOTAL
253.93k
467.41k (x1.84)

Performance/W
i3-10105
i7-12800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
4568 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
3549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
1840 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
430 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
10387 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
i7-12800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
5921 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
3944 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
2066 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
2055 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
13986 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4