| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs i3-1215U


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906a4
Core
Comet Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
10240 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
185.6k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
6.95k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
16.28k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
10.49k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
9.95k (x1.2)
TOTAL
36.97k
43.67k (x1.18)

Multithread

i3-10105

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
14.97k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
51.01k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
30.47k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
8.59k (x2.4)
TOTAL
123.2k
105.05k (x0.85)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10105
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.19k
20.87k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
20.74k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
11.32k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
8.32k (x0.98)
TOTAL
53.77k
61.26k (x1.14)

Multithread

i3-10105

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
57.59k
45.12k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
100.63k
60.59k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.59k
28.48k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
14.06k (x3.95)
TOTAL
190.38k
148.26k (x0.78)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10105
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.11k
15.63k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
20.2k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.71k
9.94k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
8.06k (x1.02)
TOTAL
53.83k
53.83k (x1)

Multithread

i3-10105

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.25k
35.72k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
105.73k
56.41k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.8k
25k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
12.48k (x3.56)
TOTAL
195.29k
129.6k (x0.66)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
37.56k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
21.13k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
11.35k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
10.31k (x1.24)
TOTAL
68.92k
80.34k (x1.17)

Multithread

i3-10105

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
73.97k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
72.37k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
29.61k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
9.65k (x2.71)
TOTAL
253.93k
185.6k (x0.73)

Performance/W
i3-10105
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
12374 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4