| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs i7-1195G7


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806c2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2021
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
239.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
4.57k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
17.21k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
9.97k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
14.98k (x1.8)
TOTAL
36.97k
46.75k (x1.26)

Multithread

i3-10105

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
12.75k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
45.98k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
27.86k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
20.06k (x5.61)
TOTAL
123.2k
106.66k (x0.87)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
30.89k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
25.57k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
10.64k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
15.66k (x1.89)
TOTAL
68.92k
82.77k (x1.2)

Multithread

i3-10105

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
96.34k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
95.75k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
32.29k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
15.2k (x4.27)
TOTAL
253.93k
239.58k (x0.94)

Performance/W
i3-10105
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4