| | | | | | |

Core i3-10105 vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10105 gets a score of 253.9 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.92k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
253.93k points
210.4k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10105
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.5k
4.26k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
18.39k
19.54k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
10.95k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
11.08k (x1.33)
TOTAL
36.97k
45.84k (x1.24)

Multithread

i3-10105

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
16.13k
15.69k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
75.62k
68.3k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.88k
33.66k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
12.16k (x3.4)
TOTAL
123.2k
129.81k (x1.05)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10105
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
16.19k
14.48k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
24.18k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
11.95k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
11.01k (x1.3)
TOTAL
53.77k
61.62k (x1.15)

Multithread

i3-10105

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
57.59k
50.98k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
100.63k
80.7k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.59k
36.61k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
12.02k (x3.38)
TOTAL
190.38k
180.32k (x0.95)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10105
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
16.11k
16.27k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
25.74k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.71k
11.5k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
10.82k (x1.37)
TOTAL
53.83k
64.32k (x1.19)

Multithread

i3-10105

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
58.25k
54k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
105.73k
88.76k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.8k
35.23k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
12.14k (x3.46)
TOTAL
195.29k
190.12k (x0.97)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10105
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
28.9k
22.97k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
25.85k
21.61k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.88k
8.99k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.29k
8.52k (x1.03)
TOTAL
68.92k
62.1k (x0.9)

Multithread

i3-10105

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
111.69k
82.75k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
110.23k
86.58k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.45k
29.34k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
11.72k (x3.3)
TOTAL
253.93k
210.4k (x0.83)

Performance/W
i3-10105
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1718 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
438 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
3907 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10105
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6568 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5876 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1883 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
15664 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4