| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Xeon X5675


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 173.3 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.4 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
206c2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
6 /12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
February 2011

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
13839
8768 (-36.64%)
Test#2 (FP)
19787
5820 (-70.58%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5282
3472 (-34.27%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8315
2983 (-64.13%)
TOTAL
47222
21043 (-55.44%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
54670
53232 (-2.63%)
Test#2 (FP)
90708
39355 (-56.61%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24109
27048 (12.19%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
5284 (37.08%)
TOTAL
173341
124918 (-27.93%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
841 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1396 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
371 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
2667 points/W
1315 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3218 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4602 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1228 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1934 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
10982 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9