| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Xeon E5-2690 0


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 175.2 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
206d7
Core
Comet Lake-S
Sandy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
8 /16
TDP
65 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2012

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
8759 (-36.90%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
7346 (-64.91%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
3857 (-25.49%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
3320 (-59.52%)
TOTAL
48194
23281 (-51.69%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
78509 (43.06%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
66455 (-28.68%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
36419 (56.05%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
3877 (0.57%)
TOTAL
175244
185259 (5.72%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
844 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1433 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
2696 points/W
1372 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3228 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4869 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1907 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
11208 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9