| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
406f1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2016

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
2604 (-39.79%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
7552 (-51.89%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
2612 (-48.14%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
2028 (-73.59%)
TOTAL
32734
14794 (-54.80%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
17415 (5.00%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
75463 (6.14%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
26246 (12.82%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
4652 (20.47%)
TOTAL
114806
123775 (7.81%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
13839
8218 (-40.62%)
Test#2 (FP)
19787
12063 (-39.04%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5282
4006 (-24.16%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8315
2890 (-65.25%)
TOTAL
47222
27176 (-42.45%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
54670
61342 (12.20%)
Test#2 (FP)
90708
90207 (-0.55%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24109
26195 (8.65%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
4625 (19.98%)
TOTAL
173341
182369 (5.21%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
6040 (-56.49%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
10180 (-51.38%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
2745 (-46.97%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
2406 (-70.67%)
TOTAL
48194
21370 (-55.66%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
47514 (-13.42%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
75116 (-19.38%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
19719 (-15.50%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
5455 (41.52%)
TOTAL
175244
147804 (-15.66%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
12163 (-49.96%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
11818 (-46.64%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
3016 (-41.34%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
2397 (-71.67%)
TOTAL
60056
29395 (-51.06%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
103774 (2.26%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
102275 (4.32%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
26135 (7.63%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
5646 (46.15%)
TOTAL
227670
237831 (4.46%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
2798 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9