Core i3-10100T vs Xeon E3-1270 v2
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E3-1270 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 175.2 k points while the E3-1270 v2 gets 139.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.3 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 175.2 k points while the E3-1270 v2 gets 139.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.3 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306a9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-H2
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /8
TDP
65 W
69 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
36.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
139.38k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
13.16k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
12.51k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
5.62k (x0.69)
TOTAL
48.19k
36.29k (x0.75)
Multithread
i3-10100T
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
51.89k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
57.35k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
23.74k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
6.4k (x1.66)
TOTAL
175.24k
139.38k (x0.8)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
844 points/W
752 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1433 points/W
831 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
344 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
2696 points/W
2020 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3228 points/GHz
3374 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4869 points/GHz
3207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1907 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
11208 points/GHz
9304 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4