| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.1 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
50657
Core
Comet Lake-S
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2020
February 2020

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
1966 (-54.55%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
8145 (-48.10%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
2368 (-52.98%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
4839 (-36.97%)
TOTAL
32734
17318 (-47.09%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
15730 (-5.16%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
64776 (-8.89%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
18061 (-22.36%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
5205 (34.80%)
TOTAL
114806
103772 (-9.61%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
12922 (-46.84%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
10972 (-50.46%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
2535 (-50.69%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
5088 (-39.85%)
TOTAL
60056
31517 (-47.52%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
103335 (1.82%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
87674 (-10.57%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
20105 (-17.20%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
4906 (27.00%)
TOTAL
227670
216019 (-5.12%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
2541 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9