Core i3-10100T vs N100
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 2.6 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 2.6 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
b06e0
Core
Comet Lake-S
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
15.23k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
11.04k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
5.54k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
4.98k (x0.59)
TOTAL
60.06k
36.79k (x0.61)
Multithread
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
37.07k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
32.57k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
14.75k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.9k (x1.01)
TOTAL
227.67k
88.29k (x0.39)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4