| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i7-8750H


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i7-8750H gets 231.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
53.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
231.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
3.01k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
11.68k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
3.78k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
5.64k (x0.74)
TOTAL
32.73k
24.12k (x0.74)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
7.4k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
29.99k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
9.66k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
5.12k (x1.33)
TOTAL
114.81k
52.18k (x0.45)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
15.14k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
22.8k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5.5k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
10.97k (x1.34)
TOTAL
48.19k
54.41k (x1.13)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
82.81k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
118.58k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
25.08k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
4.86k (x1.26)
TOTAL
175.24k
231.34k (x1.32)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
22.36k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
19.33k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
4.4k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
7.32k (x0.87)
TOTAL
60.06k
53.41k (x0.89)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
103.82k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
100.47k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
23.81k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.8k (x0.98)
TOTAL
227.67k
231.9k (x1.02)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
2307 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2233 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
529 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
5153 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
5454 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
4714 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1073 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1786 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
13027 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4