| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i7-5820K


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-5820K is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i7-5820K gets 251 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
15360 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
250.98k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
3.82k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
9.64k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
4.29k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
3.78k (x0.49)
TOTAL
32.73k
21.53k (x0.66)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
18.07k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
64.25k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
27.03k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
8.03k (x2.08)
TOTAL
114.81k
117.38k (x1.02)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
12.03k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
11.23k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.55k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
3.72k (x0.45)
TOTAL
48.19k
31.53k (x0.65)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
49.48k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
52.21k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
19.7k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
7.67k (x1.99)
TOTAL
175.24k
129.06k (x0.74)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
19.86k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
11.2k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
4.43k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
3.67k (x0.43)
TOTAL
60.06k
39.16k (x0.65)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
126.19k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
83.02k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
32.36k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
9.41k (x2.44)
TOTAL
227.67k
250.98k (x1.1)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
231 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
1793 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
5516 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
3112 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1232 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
10878 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4