Core i3-10100T vs i7-4820K
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306e4
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ivy Bridge -E
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
32.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
134.08k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
11.85k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
11.84k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.69k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
4.12k (x0.5)
TOTAL
48.19k
32.49k (x0.67)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
47.65k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
54.81k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
21.56k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
10.05k (x2.61)
TOTAL
175.24k
134.08k (x0.77)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
844 points/W
367 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1433 points/W
422 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
2696 points/W
1031 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3228 points/GHz
3039 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4869 points/GHz
3035 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
1201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1907 points/GHz
1056 points/GHz
TOTAL
11208 points/GHz
8331 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4