| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i7-10750H


Description
Both models i3-10100T and i7-10750H are based on Comet Lake architecture.

Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i7-10750H gets 348.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
a0652
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2020

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
4691 (8.47%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
18709 (19.20%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
5836 (15.89%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
13950 (81.69%)
TOTAL
32734
43186 (31.93%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
18787 (13.27%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
86105 (21.11%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
27416 (17.85%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
5273 (36.57%)
TOTAL
114806
137581 (19.84%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13839
16627 (20.15%)
Test#2 (FP)
19787
24172 (22.16%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5282
6385 (20.88%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8315
13689 (64.63%)
TOTAL
47222
60872 (28.91%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
54670
67071 (22.68%)
Test#2 (FP)
90708
107946 (19.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24109
27049 (12.20%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
5074 (31.63%)
TOTAL
173341
207140 (19.50%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
16711 (20.39%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
25455 (21.59%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
6065 (17.17%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
13195 (60.89%)
TOTAL
48194
61426 (27.46%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
67592 (23.17%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
111937 (20.14%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
27696 (18.68%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
5301 (37.52%)
TOTAL
175244
212526 (21.27%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
29108 (19.74%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
26501 (19.66%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
6272 (21.98%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
13807 (63.23%)
TOTAL
60056
75688 (26.03%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
154202 (51.95%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
151546 (54.57%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
36183 (49.02%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
6598 (70.81%)
TOTAL
227670
348529 (53.09%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
3368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
804 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
147 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
7745 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
5822 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5300 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1254 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
2761 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
15138 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9