| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i5-8500


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-8500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i5-8500 gets 307.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8500 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
69.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
307.52k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
4.19k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
17.38k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
5.46k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
11.92k (x1.55)
TOTAL
32.73k
38.96k (x1.19)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
27.67k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
94.07k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
29.05k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
4.39k (x1.14)
TOTAL
114.81k
155.18k (x1.35)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
15.22k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
22.02k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
5.75k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
12.17k (x1.46)
TOTAL
47.22k
55.17k (x1.17)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
87.78k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
126.73k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
32.93k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
4.22k (x1.09)
TOTAL
173.34k
251.65k (x1.45)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
15.21k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
22.94k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5.54k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
11.39k (x1.39)
TOTAL
48.19k
55.07k (x1.14)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
79.52k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
107.78k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
31.89k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
13.37k (x3.47)
TOTAL
175.24k
232.55k (x1.33)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
27.36k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
24.27k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
5.69k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
11.77k (x1.39)
TOTAL
60.06k
69.09k (x1.15)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
144.77k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
129.04k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
29.53k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
4.18k (x1.08)
TOTAL
227.67k
307.52k (x1.35)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
2227 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
1985 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
454 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
4731 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
6673 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5920 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1388 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
2870 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
16850 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4