Core i3-10100T vs i5-8265U
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.6 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.6 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-S
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
143.23k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
3.68k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
16.08k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
4.99k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
7.95k (x1.04)
TOTAL
32.73k
32.69k (x1)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
14.29k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
61.15k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
16.53k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.72k (x0.96)
TOTAL
114.81k
95.69k (x0.83)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
13.6k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
20.03k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
5.19k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
7.05k (x0.85)
TOTAL
47.22k
45.87k (x0.97)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
51.42k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
77.48k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
16.65k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
3.69k (x0.96)
TOTAL
173.34k
149.24k (x0.86)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
13.66k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
21.17k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
8.11k (x0.99)
TOTAL
48.19k
47.94k (x0.99)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
51.36k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
79.72k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
16.61k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
3.75k (x0.97)
TOTAL
175.24k
151.44k (x0.86)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
19.19k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
17.47k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
4.04k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
5.97k (x0.71)
TOTAL
60.06k
46.67k (x0.78)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
64.43k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
61.91k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
13.36k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.52k (x0.91)
TOTAL
227.67k
143.23k (x0.63)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
4296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
890 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
9548 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
4920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
4478 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
11966 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4