| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i5-7200U


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i5-7200U gets 98.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 2.3 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806e9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
45.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
98.51k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
3.08k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
11.93k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
3.87k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
5.89k (x0.77)
TOTAL
32.73k
24.78k (x0.76)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
6.25k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
26.49k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
9.18k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
6.04k (x1.56)
TOTAL
114.81k
47.95k (x0.42)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
11.12k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
16.05k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
4.12k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
5.72k (x0.69)
TOTAL
47.22k
37.01k (x0.78)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
20.96k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
32.09k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
8.56k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
5.76k (x1.5)
TOTAL
173.34k
67.37k (x0.39)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
11.36k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
17.26k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.03k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
4.77k (x0.58)
TOTAL
48.19k
37.42k (x0.78)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
24.08k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
41.23k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
10.19k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
4.72k (x1.22)
TOTAL
175.24k
80.22k (x0.46)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
19.33k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
17.46k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
4.05k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
4.42k (x0.52)
TOTAL
60.06k
45.25k (x0.75)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
43k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
41.67k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
9.63k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
4.22k (x1.09)
TOTAL
227.67k
98.51k (x0.43)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
2866 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2778 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
642 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
281 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
6567 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
6236 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5631 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1305 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1425 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
14596 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4