Core i3-10100T vs i5-7200U
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i5-7200U gets 101.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 2.2 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i5-7200U gets 101.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 2.2 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806e9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2016
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
3155 (-27.06%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
12853 (-18.11%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
4144 (-17.72%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
5212 (-32.12%)
TOTAL
32734
25362 (-22.52%)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
6279 (-62.14%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
29268 (-58.83%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
9306 (-59.99%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
4705 (21.85%)
TOTAL
114806
49558 (-56.83%)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
13839
11389 (-17.70%)
Test#2 (FP)
19787
16470 (-16.76%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5282
4359 (-17.47%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8315
5209 (-37.36%)
TOTAL
47222
37426 (-20.74%)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
54670
23574 (-56.88%)
Test#2 (FP)
90708
37398 (-58.77%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24109
10149 (-57.90%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
4780 (24.00%)
TOTAL
173341
75901 (-56.21%)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
11364 (-18.13%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
17265 (-17.54%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
4029 (-22.17%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
4766 (-41.89%)
TOTAL
48194
37422 (-22.35%)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
24082 (-56.12%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
41228 (-55.75%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
10187 (-56.35%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
4721 (22.48%)
TOTAL
175244
80219 (-54.22%)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
20298 (-16.50%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
18318 (-17.29%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
4294 (-16.49%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
4334 (-48.76%)
TOTAL
60056
47245 (-21.33%)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
44580 (-56.07%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
43050 (-56.09%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
10054 (-58.59%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
3954 (2.36%)
TOTAL
227670
101638 (-55.36%)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
2972 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2870 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
670 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
6776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
6548 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1385 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1398 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
15240 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9