| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i5-5675R


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.2 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
40671
Core
Comet Lake-S
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
Jun 2015

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
4141 (-4.26%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
14355 (-8.54%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
4940 (-1.90%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
5474 (-28.70%)
TOTAL
32734
28910 (-11.68%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
16021 (-3.41%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
54597 (-23.21%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
18694 (-19.64%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
16865 (336.78%)
TOTAL
114806
106178 (-7.52%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
13839
12856 (-7.10%)
Test#2 (FP)
19787
16855 (-14.82%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5282
5190 (-1.75%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8315
5494 (-33.93%)
TOTAL
47222
40394 (-14.46%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
54670
50071 (-8.41%)
Test#2 (FP)
90708
64608 (-28.77%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24109
19838 (-17.71%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
17086 (343.26%)
TOTAL
173341
151603 (-12.54%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
12881 (-7.20%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
18271 (-12.73%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
5120 (-1.07%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
5450 (-33.55%)
TOTAL
48194
41722 (-13.43%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
49914 (-9.04%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
70302 (-24.55%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
19689 (-15.63%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
16924 (339.08%)
TOTAL
175244
156830 (-10.51%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
21912 (-9.86%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
18590 (-16.06%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
5203 (1.18%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
5723 (-32.34%)
TOTAL
60056
51428 (-14.37%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
84920 (-16.32%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
72090 (-26.47%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
20126 (-17.11%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
17065 (341.75%)
TOTAL
227670
194201 (-14.70%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
2988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9