| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i5-4570


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-4570 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i5-4570 gets 161.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.4 times faster than the i5-4570 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2013

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
4164 (-3.72%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
10328 (-34.20%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
4736 (-5.96%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
4334 (-43.55%)
TOTAL
32734
23561 (-28.02%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
16505 (-0.49%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
41120 (-42.16%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
18706 (-19.59%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
7433 (92.49%)
TOTAL
114806
83763 (-27.04%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
13839
12823 (-7.34%)
Test#2 (FP)
19787
11399 (-42.39%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5282
5034 (-4.70%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8315
4270 (-48.65%)
TOTAL
47222
33525 (-29.00%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
54670
50804 (-7.07%)
Test#2 (FP)
90708
45218 (-50.15%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24109
19844 (-17.69%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
4847 (25.75%)
TOTAL
173341
120713 (-30.36%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
13135 (-5.38%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
12023 (-42.57%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
4996 (-3.48%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
4651 (-43.29%)
TOTAL
48194
34803 (-27.78%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
49747 (-9.35%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
45717 (-50.93%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
19929 (-14.61%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
9046 (134.70%)
TOTAL
175244
124440 (-28.99%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
21721 (-10.64%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
12268 (-44.61%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
5033 (-2.12%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
4541 (-46.31%)
TOTAL
60056
43564 (-27.46%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
85746 (-15.51%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
48711 (-50.32%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
20079 (-17.31%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
7071 (83.03%)
TOTAL
227670
161607 (-29.02%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1021 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
580 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
239 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
1924 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
6034 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
3408 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1398 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1261 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
12101 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9