| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i5-3337U


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-3337U gets 48.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 3.6 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306a9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/8
2 /2
TDP
65 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
23.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
48.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
2.55k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
7.24k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
3.26k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
3.37k (x0.44)
TOTAL
32.73k
16.42k (x0.5)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
5.03k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
14.79k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
7.37k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
4.53k (x1.17)
TOTAL
114.81k
31.72k (x0.28)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
8.64k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
8.55k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
3.42k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
3.22k (x0.39)
TOTAL
48.19k
23.82k (x0.49)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
17.28k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
19.67k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
7.59k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
3.75k (x0.97)
TOTAL
175.24k
48.3k (x0.28)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
844 points/W
1017 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1433 points/W
1157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
447 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
221 points/W
TOTAL
2696 points/W
2841 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
3228 points/GHz
3201 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4869 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1907 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
TOTAL
11208 points/GHz
8824 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4