| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i5-2430M


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-2430M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-2430M gets 40.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 4.3 times faster than the i5-2430M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
206a7
Core
Comet Lake-S
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
Socket G2 (988B) / rPGA988B
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
October 2011

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
8040 (-42.08%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
7373 (-64.78%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
3526 (-31.88%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
3272 (-60.11%)
TOTAL
48194
22211 (-53.91%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
15744 (-71.31%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
14047 (-84.92%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
7160 (-69.32%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
3812 (-1.09%)
TOTAL
175244
40763 (-76.74%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
844 points/W
450 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1433 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
205 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
2696 points/W
1165 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
3228 points/GHz
2680 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4869 points/GHz
2458 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1907 points/GHz
1091 points/GHz
TOTAL
11208 points/GHz
7404 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9