| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 214.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.1 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2019

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
3876 (-10.38%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
14979 (-4.56%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
9699 (92.60%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
8599 (12.00%)
TOTAL
32734
37153 (13.50%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
14612 (-11.90%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
54898 (-22.78%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
27578 (18.55%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
5044 (30.64%)
TOTAL
114806
102132 (-11.04%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
13839
12888 (-6.87%)
Test#2 (FP)
19787
18551 (-6.25%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5282
9934 (88.08%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8315
9539 (14.72%)
TOTAL
47222
50912 (7.81%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
54670
50059 (-8.43%)
Test#2 (FP)
90708
66100 (-27.13%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24109
20239 (-16.05%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
5514 (43.06%)
TOTAL
173341
141913 (-18.13%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
13578 (-2.18%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
19526 (-6.73%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
9372 (81.07%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
9227 (12.50%)
TOTAL
48194
51703 (7.28%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
56252 (2.50%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
73733 (-20.87%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
29564 (26.68%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
5395 (39.96%)
TOTAL
175244
164944 (-5.88%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
26084 (7.30%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
19613 (-11.44%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
9603 (86.76%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
9118 (7.80%)
TOTAL
60056
64418 (7.26%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
95658 (-5.74%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
81695 (-16.67%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
31677 (30.46%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
5059 (30.96%)
TOTAL
227670
214089 (-5.97%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
6377 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
5446 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
2112 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
337 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
14273 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
7246 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5448 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
2533 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
17894 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9