| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i5-10210U


Description
Both models i3-10100T and i5-10210U are based on Comet Lake architecture.

Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i5-10210U gets 173.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2019

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
25645 (5.49%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
23228 (4.88%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
4750 (-7.63%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
8677 (2.58%)
TOTAL
60056
62299 (3.73%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
79853 (-21.32%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
72146 (-26.41%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
16665 (-31.37%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
5238 (35.58%)
TOTAL
227670
173901 (-23.62%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
5324 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
4810 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
1111 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
349 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
11593 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5531 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1131 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
2066 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
14833 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9