Core i3-10100T vs i5-10210U
Description
Both models i3-10100T and i5-10210U are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
23.11k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
20.58k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
4.73k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
7.43k (x0.88)
TOTAL
60.06k
55.86k (x0.93)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
65.84k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
60.77k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
14.45k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
4.44k (x1.15)
TOTAL
227.67k
145.51k (x0.64)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4