Core i3-10100T vs i3-7100
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i3-7100 gets 126.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.8 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i3-7100 gets 126.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.8 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
906e9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
58.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
126.47k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
4.01k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
16.38k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
5.31k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
3.98k (x0.52)
TOTAL
32.73k
29.69k (x0.91)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
8.1k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
38.7k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
12.69k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.76k (x0.97)
TOTAL
114.81k
63.24k (x0.55)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
14.04k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
20.55k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
5.41k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
3.99k (x0.48)
TOTAL
47.22k
43.99k (x0.93)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
30.09k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
47.84k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
13.13k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
3.52k (x0.91)
TOTAL
173.34k
94.59k (x0.55)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
14.41k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
22.38k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5.45k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
4.96k (x0.61)
TOTAL
48.19k
47.21k (x0.98)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
30.48k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
52.08k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
12.97k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
4.56k (x1.18)
TOTAL
175.24k
100.1k (x0.57)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
25.77k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
23.26k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
5.43k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
4.09k (x0.48)
TOTAL
60.06k
58.55k (x0.97)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
54.98k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
54.73k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
13.12k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.65k (x0.94)
TOTAL
227.67k
126.47k (x0.56)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
257 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
2480 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
6607 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5964 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1393 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1049 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
15014 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4