Core i3-10100T vs i3-6100
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 2 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 2 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
506e3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
65 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
112.28k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
3.81k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
15.65k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
5.14k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
4.28k (x0.56)
TOTAL
32.73k
28.89k (x0.88)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
7.75k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
37.33k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
12.13k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.56k (x0.92)
TOTAL
114.81k
60.77k (x0.53)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
13.76k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
19.96k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
5.44k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
4.4k (x0.53)
TOTAL
47.22k
43.55k (x0.92)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
28.99k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
45.75k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
12.72k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
3.68k (x0.95)
TOTAL
173.34k
91.14k (x0.53)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
13.78k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
21.21k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5.2k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
3.73k (x0.46)
TOTAL
48.19k
43.92k (x0.91)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
29.02k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
49.55k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
12.3k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
3.28k (x0.85)
TOTAL
175.24k
94.15k (x0.54)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
22.89k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
21.04k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
4.9k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
4.01k (x0.47)
TOTAL
60.06k
52.84k (x0.88)
Multithread
i3-10100T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
50.05k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
47.13k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
11.38k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.72k (x0.96)
TOTAL
227.67k
112.28k (x0.49)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
2202 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4