| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i3-6006U


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i3-6006U gets 68.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 3.3 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
406e3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2016

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
2019 (-53.32%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
8202 (-47.74%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
2631 (-47.75%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
3923 (-48.91%)
TOTAL
32734
16774 (-48.75%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
3826 (-76.93%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
17170 (-75.85%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
5775 (-75.18%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
3619 (-6.29%)
TOTAL
114806
30389 (-73.53%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
13839
7279 (-47.40%)
Test#2 (FP)
19787
10510 (-46.88%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5282
2808 (-46.85%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8315
2882 (-65.34%)
TOTAL
47222
23479 (-50.28%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
54670
14976 (-72.61%)
Test#2 (FP)
90708
23682 (-73.89%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24109
6371 (-73.57%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
2435 (-36.83%)
TOTAL
173341
47464 (-72.62%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
7340 (-47.12%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
11367 (-45.71%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
2743 (-47.00%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
3080 (-62.45%)
TOTAL
48194
24529 (-49.10%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
15324 (-72.08%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
25607 (-72.52%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
6358 (-72.76%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
2583 (-32.98%)
TOTAL
175244
49872 (-71.54%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
12888 (-46.98%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
11717 (-47.10%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
2743 (-46.66%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
3950 (-53.30%)
TOTAL
60056
31298 (-47.89%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
29950 (-70.49%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
27929 (-71.51%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
6735 (-72.26%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
3765 (-2.54%)
TOTAL
227670
68380 (-69.97%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1997 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
1862 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
449 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
251 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
4559 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
6444 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5858 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1371 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1975 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
15649 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9