| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 3.1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806d0
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
709.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
4.4k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
20.25k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
11.69k (x2.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
11.66k (x1.52)
TOTAL
32.73k
48.01k (x1.47)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
38.93k (x2.35)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
191.89k (x2.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
108.8k (x4.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
14.95k (x3.87)
TOTAL
114.81k
354.57k (x3.09)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
15.22k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
25.2k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
12.66k (x2.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
11.66k (x1.4)
TOTAL
47.22k
64.74k (x1.37)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
155.37k (x2.84)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
260.27k (x2.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
115.37k (x4.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
20.04k (x5.2)
TOTAL
173.34k
551.04k (x3.18)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
17.25k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
25.53k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
12.56k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
11.4k (x1.39)
TOTAL
48.19k
66.74k (x1.38)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
144.5k (x2.63)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
243.41k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
109.02k (x4.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
16k (x4.15)
TOTAL
175.24k
512.94k (x2.93)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
30.84k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
26.38k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
12.66k (x2.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
11.74k (x1.39)
TOTAL
60.06k
81.62k (x1.36)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
294.86k (x2.91)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
280.92k (x2.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
113.9k (x4.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
20.16k (x5.22)
TOTAL
227.67k
709.85k (x3.12)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4