| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 9 3900


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900 is 3 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
687.5k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
4.39k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
16.99k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
7.74k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
24.57k (x3.2)
TOTAL
32.73k
53.69k (x1.64)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
48.45k (x2.92)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
230.81k (x3.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
122.82k (x5.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
54.73k (x14.17)
TOTAL
114.81k
456.8k (x3.98)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
16.59k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
24.55k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
8.55k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
26.28k (x3.16)
TOTAL
47.22k
75.97k (x1.61)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
181.33k (x3.32)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
261.01k (x2.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
126.62k (x5.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
66.64k (x17.29)
TOTAL
173.34k
635.6k (x3.67)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
16.16k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
23.75k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
9.32k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
23.17k (x2.83)
TOTAL
48.19k
72.4k (x1.5)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
174.73k (x3.18)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
275.63k (x2.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
125.65k (x5.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
44.17k (x11.46)
TOTAL
175.24k
620.18k (x3.54)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
16.85k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
26.03k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
9.54k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
22.55k (x2.67)
TOTAL
60.06k
74.97k (x1.25)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
229.41k (x2.26)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
292.81k (x2.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
128.48k (x5.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
36.8k (x9.53)
TOTAL
227.67k
687.5k (x3.02)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
10577 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4